Where hypocrisy lives rent-free. And apparently, so do the pets.
Thereās a by-law here. A firm one. Clear, concise, definitive: one pet per unit.
That is, of course, unless the pet belongs to someone they like.
In practice, our building resembles a low-budget wildlife reserve. Two cats? Common. Three dogs? Happens. Exotic birds? Several. One resident even has a parrot that recites the fire code – inaccurately, but with conviction.
None of this is questioned. No warning letters. No ācomplianceā meetings. No interrogations in the lobby with clipboard in hand.
But I brought two dogs. Service dogs. Prescribed, documented, legal.
Cue the inquisition.
āWhy did you move here if you knew you werenāt allowed two dogs?ā my neighbors ask.
Because, as it turns out, I was under the mistaken impression that rules were applied equally. That disabilities were accommodated. That fairness was something more than decorative language in the Condominium Act.
I expected reason. I got Mildred and Bite Barker.

Meanwhile, the same people who asked that question go home to multi-pet households – without a whiff of irony. No one asks them why they moved here. No one reports their dogs, cats, birds, or emotional support turtles.
Whatās most striking isnāt the hypocrisy. Hypocrisy, after all, is expected. Itās the silence. The same neighbours who greet you with nods and smiles suddenly develop laryngitis when youāre being dragged through procedural mud. Because why risk saying something when you can quietly enjoy your two cats and pretend you didnāt see anything?
This isnāt about pets. It never was.
Itās about control. About who gets questioned and who doesnāt.
About who gets targeted, and who gets quietly left alone.
So yes – I live in a building with a strict one-pet rule.
And yes – Iām surrounded by people who break it daily.
But only one of us needed a doctorās note.
And only one of us was treated like a problem.
Disclaimer: This post is satire and opinion. Read full disclaimer.