Once upon a condo hallway, democracy taped a flyer to a bulletin board.
“They said no loan was approved. But it was… Oops.”
“Your maintenance fees are going up. Again. But hey, the lights still flicker.”
And just like that – Blazer descended.
Wearing the air of a man deeply committed to selective transparency, he sprang into action. Not to answer the flyer. Not to refute it. But to remove it.
Because nothing says “open governance” like quietly peeling down the paper trail.
🧽 Blazer’s Clean-Up Campaign
This isn’t about rules. It’s about reputations.
Every time a flyer tells the truth – about:
- the loan they said they never approved but they did….
- the hallway fund that disappeared into a legal black hole,
- or the fees that climb like a condo tower with no elevator access…
…it disappears faster than a promise at a board meeting.
But the flyers that do stay up?
“Vote Blazer: Because Who Needs Consent When You Have Confidence?”
Those are laminated.
🔁 Recycling Lies, Not Flyers
Let’s review the timeline:
- They told residents there was no loan.
- The minutes said otherwise.
- A flyer said, “Hey, did you notice this contradiction?”
- Blazer said, “Time to clean.”
That’s not a governance model – that’s a stage play with bad actors and no refunds.
🧠 Who Needs Debate When You Have a Recycling Bin?
We tried to inform residents about:
- Misleading affidavits.
- Legal costs disguised as “consulting.”
- The clause in the Declaration that protects owners from exactly this behaviour.
But Blazer said no.
And by “said,” we mean silently removed the flyers under cover of hallway darkness.
🧾 Meanwhile…
Your fees?
Going up.
Your board?
Still pretending financial fiction is leadership.
Your right to know?
Apparently, a violation.
🗨️ Final Thought:
“We believe in transparency,” said Blazer, removing the flyer about the approved loan with one hand while adjusting the “Re-Elect Me” poster with the other.
Disclaimer: This post is satire and opinion. Read full disclaimer.
