🧠 The Dunning-Kruger Board of Blenvale:

By

Where Confidence Is Mandatory and Competence… Optional

There’s ignorance.
Then there’s Dunning-Kruger Deluxeā„¢ – proudly worn by the board like a medal from the University of Made-It-Up.

🧠 Diagnosing Kunning-Dunning Governance

If you’ve ever wondered how a condo board could lose two legal decisions, spend over $300,000, and still think they’re doing a stellar job – welcome to the Kunning-Dunning Effect in action.

Coined from the real Dunning-Kruger Effect, this phenomenon occurs when those least equipped to lead are also the most convinced they’re right. Now add a clip-on name tag and a corporate bank account? You’ve got a governance crisis.

Here’s how it shows up:

SymptomWhat It Looks Like in Blenvale
Legal OverconfidenceMisquoting the Condominium Act while ignoring actual court rulings.
Delusional OptimismLaunching an appeal without informing owners – and losing.
Policy AmnesiaForgetting the Human Rights Code exists. Repeatedly.
Strategic IgnoranceClaiming ā€œwe didn’t know we had to inform the communityā€ while spending hundreds of thousands.
Reverse Accountability ReflexBlaming owners, lawyers, and service dogs – anyone but themselves.
Radio SilenceRefusing to resign, refusing to speak, and pretending the last memo never happened.

These are the same folks who, by law, must be trained in:

  • The Condominium Act,
  • Human rights obligations,
  • And basic principles like ā€œdon’t sue your own owners without telling them.ā€

But somewhere between their certificate and their next court loss, that knowledge was replaced with:

ā€œWell, we just don’t agree with that.ā€


šŸŽ“ Mandatory Training, Optional Retention

They took the course. We assume.
Somewhere, there’s probably a certificate in a drawer next to the dried-up highlighters and the list of violations they only enforce on Tuesdays.

But applying that training?
Ah, no no. That would require humility, reading, and the one skill they truly lack:
Knowing what they don’t know.


šŸ“œ Exhibit A: The Human Rights Smackdown

They actually thought ā€œaccommodation is optional.ā€
That’s like saying gravity is negotiable, or that court rulings are a matter of personal taste.

It’s not just wrong – it’s legally radioactive.

Yet they forged ahead, eyes blazing, bank account open, logic absent.


šŸ‘ Exhibit B: The Governance Sheep Shuffle

Instead of telling owners the truth, they told them:

  • I was ā€œjust upset,ā€
  • Everything was ā€œin the best interest of the community,ā€ and
  • Laws are more of a suggestion, really.

And when the court said:
ā€œYou were wrong. Pay her damages.ā€
they shrugged and said,

ā€œWe strongly disagree.ā€


šŸ’° Final Bill for the Dunning-Kruger Masterclass?

  • šŸ’ø $300,000 in legal waste
  • 🧾 $17,500 in cost awards
  • 🐾 One service dog they couldn’t evict
  • āš–ļø Two legal losses
  • 🧨 And now? A possible court takeover

All because people who should have known betterchose not to.


🧯 Final Thought

If you ever wondered what happens when self-confidence meets zero legal comprehension and access to a corporate bank account?

This. This is what happens.

They weren’t trained.
They were emboldened.

And now we’re all footing the bill for their crash course in reality.

Disclaimer: This post is satire and opinion. Read full disclaimer.


Discover more from Condo Chronicles

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Condo Chronicles

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading