Where Confidence Is Mandatory and Competence⦠Optional
Thereās ignorance. Then thereās Dunning-Kruger Deluxe⢠– proudly worn by the board like a medal from the University of Made-It-Up.
š§ Diagnosing Kunning-Dunning Governance
If you’ve ever wondered how a condo board could lose two legal decisions, spend over $300,000, and still think they’re doing a stellar job – welcome to the Kunning-Dunning Effect in action.
Coined from the real Dunning-Kruger Effect, this phenomenon occurs when those least equipped to lead are also the most convinced theyāre right. Now add a clip-on name tag and a corporate bank account? Youāve got a governance crisis.
Hereās how it shows up:
Symptom
What It Looks Like in Blenvale
Legal Overconfidence
Misquoting the Condominium Act while ignoring actual court rulings.
Delusional Optimism
Launching an appeal without informing owners – and losing.
Policy Amnesia
Forgetting the Human Rights Code exists. Repeatedly.
Strategic Ignorance
Claiming āwe didnāt know we had to inform the communityā while spending hundreds of thousands.
Reverse Accountability Reflex
Blaming owners, lawyers, and service dogs – anyone but themselves.
Radio Silence
Refusing to resign, refusing to speak, and pretending the last memo never happened.
These are the same folks who, by law, must be trained in:
The Condominium Act,
Human rights obligations,
And basic principles like ādonāt sue your own owners without telling them.ā
But somewhere between their certificate and their next court loss, that knowledge was replaced with:
āWell, we just donāt agree with that.ā
š Mandatory Training, Optional Retention
They took the course. We assume. Somewhere, there’s probably a certificate in a drawer next to the dried-up highlighters and the list of violations they only enforce on Tuesdays.
But applying that training? Ah, no no. That would require humility, reading, and the one skill they truly lack: Knowing what they donāt know.
š Exhibit A: The Human Rights Smackdown
They actually thought āaccommodation is optional.ā Thatās like saying gravity is negotiable, or that court rulings are a matter of personal taste.
Itās not just wrong – itās legally radioactive.
Yet they forged ahead, eyes blazing, bank account open, logic absent.
š Exhibit B: The Governance Sheep Shuffle
Instead of telling owners the truth, they told them:
I was ājust upset,ā
Everything was āin the best interest of the community,ā and
Laws are more of a suggestion, really.
And when the court said: āYou were wrong. Pay her damages.ā they shrugged and said,
āWe strongly disagree.ā
š° Final Bill for the Dunning-Kruger Masterclass?
šø $300,000 in legal waste
š§¾ $17,500 in cost awards
š¾ One service dog they couldnāt evict
āļø Two legal losses
š§Ø And now? A possible court takeover
All because people who should have known better – chose not to.
š§Æ Final Thought
If you ever wondered what happens when self-confidence meets zero legal comprehension and access to a corporate bank account?
This. This is what happens.
They werenāt trained. They were emboldened.
And now weāre all footing the bill for their crash course in reality.