---

The Owner-Requisitioned Meeting Nobody Wanted You to Notice

Let’s ask the obvious questions:
Why was the owner-requisitioned meeting – called by owners, for owners – held only in person and hardly advertised? If transparency was truly the goal, why make it as difficult as possible for owners to attend?

And then, there’s the cost. The board claims the meeting cost $22,000, but here’s what we found:

---

📜 The $12,270.55 Breakdown

• $4,850.58 → One lawyer from Shibley Righton LLP to chair the meeting.
  Question: Why do we need to hire a $5,000 lawyer to do something any competent board should manage? If the board can’t chair a meeting, why are they volunteering to run a condominium?
• $6,583.38 → Two lawyers from SV Law who… sat there.
  Witnesses say they did absolutely nothing.
  Why were they there? To jump in and defend the board’s spending, of course – like the $300,000 they’ve already burned on frivolous litigation.
• $675.00 → Sanderson billed us to sit in the hallway and chat with the lawyers.
  Yes, really.
• $161.59 → Cafeteria rental.
  At least someone gave us value for money.

---

❓ The $9,729.45 Question

If the receipts add up to $12,270.55…
Where’s the rest of the $22,000 they claimed?

This wasn’t about running a meeting. This was about controlling the narrative and protecting themselves – and you, the owners, paid for it.

$12,270.55 gone.
No online access.
Minimal advertising.
Maximum legal muscle — not for you, but against you.