🧾 FACTS: How the Board Broke Every Point in Their Own “Code of Ethics”

The Board is trying to pass a “Code of Ethics” – claiming it will bring professionalism, honesty, and fairness.
But their actions already prove they’ve broken every single principle in that code.
Here’s what their record really shows.

⚖️ 1️⃣ “Act honestly and in good faith.”

They lied – repeatedly.
In the CAT proceedings, they claimed to have 12 complaints against me, that my dogs “bark excessively,” and that “multiple owners” had complained. There were 2 complaints from one owner, their President.

These weren’t misunderstandings – they were deliberate misrepresentations made under oath.
Honesty and good faith end where false evidence begins.

📢 2️⃣ “Communicate openly and transparently.”

They failed completely.
They did not hold votes or properly inform owners before launching costly litigation or approving large capital projects, even though the Condominium Act requires consultation and disclosure.
Decisions involving hundreds of thousands of dollars were made behind closed doors.

Transparency means informing the people who pay the bills – not ambushing them with after-the-fact legal invoices.

💰 3️⃣ “Act in the best interests of the corporation.”

They didn’t act for the corporation – they acted for themselves.
They spent over $400,000 in legal fees fighting owners, much of it used to defend the Board President personally.
They diverted time and money into retaliation instead of repairs and maintenance.

The “best interest of the corporation” doesn’t mean protecting one director’s ego – it means protecting owners’ money.

🤝 4️⃣ “Treat all owners fairly and without bias.”

They singled me out.
Dozens of owners have multiple pets in their units, but only I – the person with two service animals – was dragged through tribunals and courts.
That’s not rule enforcement; that’s discrimination.

Fairness means applying the same standards to everyone.
They targeted the one person who asked for accommodation and accountability.

🕵️‍♀️ 5️⃣ “Respect confidentiality and privacy.”

They violated both.
They told the community that I “failed to establish a disability” and disclosed my accommodation request, which by law must remain confidential.
That’s a direct breach of privacy and human rights.

I have recorded conversations with owners confirming this disclosure.
Those responsible for spreading or using that information will be held personally accountable under privacy and human rights law.

No ethical code can undo that kind of damage — only accountability can.

🧾 6️⃣ “Do not tarnish another person’s reputation.”

They did exactly that.
After the CAT ruled in my favor, confirming that I was right and the Board was wrong, they sent a three-page letter to the entire community portraying me as a “rule breaker.”
They deliberately distorted facts, ignored the tribunal’s findings, and tried to publicly humiliate me to justify their own misconduct.

That is not professionalism – it is defamation and retaliation.
When a Board uses owners’ money to smear an owner who proved them wrong, every owner should be alarmed.

⚒️ 7️⃣ “Avoid conflicts of interest.”

They didn’t just fail – they abused it.
They made false claims before three judicial bodies to defend the interests of their Board President.
They used corporate funds and the corporation’s lawyer to fight on his behalf, even when those matters had nothing to do with the corporation’s business.

That’s not governance – that’s misuse of corporate authority for personal protection.

🗳️ 8️⃣ “Uphold democracy and respect the will of owners.”

They ignored both.

They obstructed requisition meetings, blocked access to owner petitions, and tried to control nominations by rewriting eligibility rules.

When those in power rewrite democracy, ethics are already gone.

⚔️ 9️⃣ “Promote unity and professionalism.”

They caused division.
Instead of resolving disputes, they spread misinformation about me, encouraged hostility, and fostered a climate of intimidation.
Professionalism means resolving issues quietly and lawfully – not attacking owners who assert basic human rights.

💸 10️⃣ “Use corporation funds responsibly.”

They wasted them.
Legal bills, special assessments, consultant fees – all to fight one owner.
They even used owners’ money to circulate misleading communications, while ignoring maintenance priorities.

That’s not fiscal management; it’s financial recklessness.

🧱 11️⃣ “Follow the law.”

They broke it – repeatedly.
The CAT, the Superior Court, and now the Human Rights Tribunal have all been involved because of their unlawful conduct.
From failure to accommodate to bad-faith litigation, their track record speaks louder than any “code” they try to invent.

You don’t write ethics after you’ve broken the law – you rebuild trust by obeying it.

🧭 The Bottom Line

Every point in their own proposed “Code of Ethics” is a principle they’ve already violated – publicly, repeatedly, and without remorse.
This “Code” isn’t about integrity; it’s about control.
They don’t need a new policy. They need accountability.

Before they enforce ethics – they should try following them.

If you vote to keep this Board, you are voting for continued abuse, discrimination and retaliation – and you will pay for it. Owners will shoulder the legal fees, higher costs and special assessments that follow. I will pursue every legal remedy available and hold the corporation and directors accountable. When the courts decide, my conscience will be clear.

Condo Chronicles