Because nothing says āgood governanceā like inventing a law to muzzle one owner.
Letās take a moment to appreciate the sheer creative genius of our current board. Most condos have bylaws about pets, smoking, parking, renovationsā¦
We?
We have a by-law about a single human being.
Introducing:
š By-law 14 – The āClaudia Containment Protocolā
For educational purposes (and for future historians trying to understand how a board collectively lost the plot), hereās a summary:
āNo Owner shall communicate, petition, email, ask questions, point out mismanagement, request receipts, clarify inconsistencies, breathe too loudly, or otherwise exist in a manner that causes the Board mild discomfort.ā
Groundbreaking stuff. Really.
The Romans had the Twelve Tables.
England had the Magna Carta.
America had the Bill of Rights.
Blenvale has By-law 14.
A world first: a personalized by-law written as revenge because one owner dared ask, āWhy is the corporation breaking the law?ā
Courageous leadership.
š Famous By-laws in History
(For comparison. Because we need context to appreciate greatness.)
šļø By-law I – Socrates Must Stop Asking Annoying Questions (399 BC)
āNo citizen shall question authority to the point of making the ruling class sweat from the forehead.ā
Socrates violated it immediately.
We all know how that ended. Spoiler: poorly.
šØ By-law 2 – Leonardo da Vinci Shall Not Sketch Infrastructure Weaknesses (1499)
āAbsolutely forbidden: pointing out structural cracks, hydraulic failures, or bizarre engineering choices.ā
Leonardo violated it within hours.
Boards back then also hated transparency, apparently.
š«š· By-law 3 – Marie Antoinette Shall Ignore Bread Prices (1788)
āAny commentary on financial mismanagement shall be punishable by public eye-rolling.ā
She complied.
Outcome: suboptimal.
š¼ By-law 4 – Steve Jobs Shall Not Demand Better Design (1980)
āRepeatedly pointing out flaws is hereby banned. It makes everyone uncomfortable.ā
He ignored it.
Outcome: iPhone.
š§¹ And Now⦠By-law 14 – Claudia Shall Not Notice Anything Ever Again (2025)
In the heroic tradition of insecure leaders worldwide, our board crafted a by-law that essentially says:
āClaudia, please stop revealing our mistakes. Itās rude.ā
To which I reply, politely but firmly:
āIf you didnāt want people noticing the mess, perhaps donāt create the mess.ā

š„ Why Itās Absurd
1ļøā£ Itās illegal.
Ontario law bans retaliation.
They wrote a retaliation by-law.
Thatās like drafting a āNo Speeding While Speedingā rule.
2ļøā£ It targets one person.
Public bodies canāt do that.
Boards canāt do that.
3ļøā£ Itās embarrassing.
Imagine explaining this at a condo conference:
āYes, yes, our biggest issue was one lady who asked too many questions, so we passed a law banning her.ā
Peak professionalism.
š Award Category: Most Insecure By-law of the Century
The competition was tough:
- āNo resident shall use the gym unless wearing colours approved by the board.ā
- āOwners must smile at management at all times.ā
- āNo one may speak during meetings unless their opinion is pre-approved in writing.ā
But By-law 14 still won by landslide.
š³ļø Moral of the Story
When a board is afraid of questions, transparency, or accountability, they donāt fix problems.
They fix the person who noticed.
And that is exactly why By-law 14 exists.
And exactly why it needs to be voted down.
Disclaimer: This post is satire and opinion.Ā Read full disclaimer.