🐺 Humans Kill More Than They Need To

Every predator on this planet kills for a reason.

Wolves stop when the pack is fed.
Lions rest after the hunt.
Even sharks – so unfairly demonized – don’t kill for sport.

Humans are the exception.

We are the only species that keeps going after the need has passed.

🩸 Not Hunger. Not Survival. Something Else.

When animals kill, it’s functional:

to eat
to protect territory
to survive

When humans kill – or destroy, exclude, humiliate, erase – it’s often not about need at all.

It’s about:

dominance
fear of losing control
resentment
boredom
convenience
ego

We kill reputations when silence would do.
We crush people long after the point has been made.
We escalate not because it’s necessary – but because we can.

🧠 The Lie We Tell Ourselves

We like to believe we are the most civilized species.

But civilization is not restraint written on paper.
It’s restraint practiced when no one forces you to stop.

Animals have natural limits.
Humans invent justifications to exceed them.

Rules.
Procedures.
“Policy.”
“Just doing my job.”

That’s how unnecessary harm gets laundered into something respectable.

⚖️ When Power Replaces Hunger

The most dangerous moment isn’t desperation.

It’s when someone has power and no need – but acts anyway.

That’s when harm becomes deliberate.
That’s when cruelty becomes procedural.
That’s when destruction pretends to be order.

Animals don’t do this.
They don’t punish.
They don’t pursue annihilation for its own sake.

Humans do.

🪞 The Uncomfortable Question

If animals stop when the need is met,
and humans don’t – then maybe intelligence isn’t what separates us.

Maybe it’s the ability to rationalize excess.

And maybe the measure of humanity isn’t how much power we have, but whether we know when to stop.

Because the most chilling truth is this:

The worst harm in the world isn’t done by monsters.
It’s done by humans who didn’t need to go that far – but did anyway.

Condo Chronicles