A Brief Note on Medicine, Governance, and the Blazer (With Budgetary Considerations)

By

It still baffles me….

How people who barely graduated high school – aka our board – decided they were suddenly qualified to review, second-guess, and effectively overrule the medical recommendations of my GP and multiple specialists who have treated me for years.

Specialists, for clarity. The kind who completed medical school.
And residency. And decades of practice.

🩺📚💸

Enter Blazer & Company – who, in the absence of medical credentials, elected to substitute process.

A great deal of process.

Enough process, in fact, to spend approximately $500,000 attempting to debate medicine by committee.

🎭

In my country, we have a saying:

„Prostul nu-i prost destul dacă nu-i și fudul.”
A fool isn’t foolish enough unless he’s also arrogant.

One imagines this was not part of the budget briefing.

There is something almost admirable about the confidence required to believe that a board vote plus a blazer can outperform years of clinical care – especially when the experiment carries a half-million-dollar price tag.

🔥

This was not governance.
It was performance art.

Mediocrity dressed as charisma.
Ignorance accessorized with procedure.
Arrogance expensed as “due diligence.”

🐾🧠

Let us be clear:

You do not get to outvote medicine.
You do not get to audit specialists with vibes.
And you do not get to burn $500,000 discovering that expertise still matters.

Blazer and Company did not challenge my doctors.

They produced a remarkably expensive case study in what happens when confidence is entirely unburdened by knowledge.

A learning experience – for everyone else paying the bill.

Disclaimer: This post is satire and opinion. Read full disclaimer.


Discover more from Condo Chronicles

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Condo Chronicles

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading